Reaction paper veneration without under

Veneration with or without understanding Veneration with or without understanding 8 August Philippines One of the most debatable issues of today is Dr. The main argument being that since Rizal did not lead the revolution, he is not worthy enough to be the national hero. Constantino pointed out that almost all national hero of the world are revolutionary heroes and if you did not lead a revolution, your chances of becoming as the national hero is very little.

Reaction paper veneration without under

Share Today is Jose Rizal's th birthday. This week - a week of patriotic fervor, began with the th "Independence Day" and now ends this week with Rizal's birthday. Reaction paper veneration without under Aguinaldo declared Philippine independence on June 12,it was "under the protection of the potent and humanitarian North American nation" amid helplessness on China's incursions on the West Philippine Sea.

Search Box

What can be more ironic than that? In any case, Rizal's life and struggle has to be celebrated - but it should be celebrated with a critical mind and a nationalistic temperament.

Rizal as a hero has to be deconstructed so we can extract the essence of his heroism and put it in the context of his time. For this purpose, I am posting an article which we were asked to read in our History I class in UP Manila from the late historian Renato Constantino on Jose Rizal, Veneration without Understanding taken from this site - a brilliant excursion on the personality and historical place of our national hero.

For the national revolution is invariably the one period in a nation's history when the people were most united, most involved, and most decisively active in the fight for freedom. It is not to be wondered at, therefore, that almost always the leader of that revolution becomes the principal hero of his people.

The unity between the venerated mass action and the honored single individual enhances the influence of both.

Always guilty of cultural appropriation

In our case, our national hero was not the leader of our Revolution. In fact, he repudiated that Revolution. In no uncertain terms he placed himself against Bonifacio and those Filipinos who were fighting for the country's liberty.

In fact, when he was arrested he was on his way to Cuba to use his med- [p.

Reaction paper veneration without under

And in the manifesto of December 15, which he addressed to the Filipino peoplehe declared: From the very beginning, when I first had notice of what was being planned, I opposed it, fought it, and demonstrated its absolute impossibility. I did even more. When later, against my advice, the movement materialized, of my own accord I offered my good offices, but my very life, and even my name, to be used in whatever way might seem best, toward stifling the rebellion; for convinced of the ills which it would bring, I considered myself fortunate if, at any sacrifice, I could prevent such useless misfortune….

I have written also and I repeat my words that reforms, to be beneficial, must come from above, and those which comes from below are irregularly gained and uncertain.

Holding these ideas, I cannot do less than condemn, and I do condemn this uprising-which dishonors us Filipinos and discredits those that could plead our cause. I abhor its criminal methods and disclaim all part in it, pitying from the bottom of my heart the unwary that have been deceived into taking part in it.

Either the Revolution was wrong, yet we cannot disown it, or Rizal was wrong, yet we cannot disown him either. By and large, we have chosen to ignore this apparent contradiction.

Rizalists, especially, have taken the easy way out, which is to gloss over the matter. They have treated Rizal's condemnation of the Katipunan as a skeleton in his closet and have been responsible for the "silent treatment" on his unequivocal position against the Revolution.

To my knowledge, there has been no extensive analysis of the question. For some Rizalists, this aspect of Rizal has been a source of embarrassment inasmuch as they picture him as the supreme symbol of our struggle for freedom.

Other in fact [p. They would probably praise Rizal's stand against the Revolution, if they dared. Since they do not dare for themselves, the are also prudently silent for Rizal's sake. Others, careless and superficial in their approach to history and perhaps afraid to stir a hornet's nest of controversy, do not think it important to dwell on this contradiction between our Revolution and our national hero and elect to leave well enough alone.

Racism In The Judicial System | Persuasive Essay Format

Perhaps they do not perceive the adverse consequences of our refusal to analyze and resolve this contradiction. Yet the consequences are manifest in our regard for our Revolution and in our understanding of Rizal.

The Philippine Revolution has always been overshadowed by the omnipresent figure and the towering reputation of Rizal. Because Rizal took no part in that Revolution and in fact repudiated it, the general regard for our Revolution is not as high as it otherwise would be.

On the other hand, because we refuse to analyze the significance of his repudiation, our understanding of Rizal and of his role in our national development remains superficial. This is a disservice to the event, to the man, and to ourselves.

Viewed superficially, Rizal's reaction toward the Revolution is unexpected, coming as it did from a man whose life and labors were supposed to have been dedicated to the cause of his country's freedom. Had someone of lesser stature uttered those words of condemnation, he would have been considered a traitor to the cause.

As a matter of fact, those words were treasonous in the light of the Filipinos' struggle against Spain.

Rizal repudiated the one act which really synthesized our nationalist aspiration, and yet we consider him a nationalist leader.Veneration Without Understanding by Renato Constantino: Reaction Paper.

Why Jose Rizal is the Greatest National Hero by Elizabeth Ocampo (Book Review). We are the premier essay writing service that offers incomparable rates and quality. We can do the same custom essay, questions, accounting problems, dissertation, project proposal, term papers, research papers, and other scholarly works upon your request.

Jan 04,  · Get access to Reaction Paper Veneration Without Understanding By Renato Constantino Essays only from Anti Essays. Listed Results 1 - Get studying.

Veneration without Understanding (Does Rizal deserve to be our national hero?) By Renato Constantino In the histories of many nations, the national revolution represents a peak of achievement to which the minds of man return time and again in reverence and for a renewal of faith in freedom.

Veneration without Understanding (Does Rizal deserve to be our national hero?) By Renato Constantino In the histories of many nations, the national revolution represents a peak of achievement to which the minds of man return time and again in reverence and for a renewal of faith in freedom.

In his essay "Veneration without Understanding," he analyzed the real story behind the process of Rizal's being the national hero. Essays Related to Veneration without Understanding - Criticism of Rizal. soon found that in spite of his legal authority for it the new name was making confusion in business affairs begun under the old name.

Capitalism | Persuasive Essay Format